Criteria
|
Score
|
||||
Low
|
High
|
||||
Presentation Content (55%)
|
|||||
Identified and focused on major
issues of the case.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
Performed quality analysis that
supports the recommendations.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
Incorporated interprofessional practice
into the analysis and recommendations.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
Demonstrated clear evidence that a
variety of health profession perspectives are included.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
Extent to which recommendations
resolve the major issues in the case.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
Feasibility of the
recommendations.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
Creativity of the recommendations.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
Implementation plan prioritized
the issues and recommendations.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
Quality of the cost analysis.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
Presentation Style (25%)
|
|||||
Poise and professionalism of
verbal delivery.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
Each team member had a meaningful
role.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
Quality of presentation materials.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
Coordination of written materials
with verbal presentation.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
Questions and Answers (20%)
|
|||||
Answered questions that were
posed.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
Responses demonstrated breadth and
depth in understanding the issues.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
Responses were clear and
well-articulated.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
All team members participated in
answering questions.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
Friday, February 13, 2015
Updated Judging Rubric
Greetings teams! There has been a slight change to the Judging Rubric that we would like to bring to your attention. Teams will be judged using the following score sheet (which is slightly different from the one listed in your current guidebooks)
CLARION Case Questions and Answers 2/13/2015
Question:
I would like to know if we will be provided with a patient/provider mix of STHN in order to make an analysis on that.
Answer:
STHN is a start-up organization, so it would have limited experience with payor mix. The area is both poor and aged, so you can reasonably assume that the member organizations serve a heavier than average Medicare and Medicaid mix. If you feel this information is important to arrive at your recommendation, then as part of your research, examine the patient/provider mix in the member organizations listed for that region.
Question:
Will you provide us with an income statement and balance sheet?
Answer:
Review the resources provided with the case. Keep in mind that STHN is in start-up mode. It has had capital contributions from the members to get started. The members will need to make additional capital contributions based on the business plan. That is why re-looking at the assumptions and strategy is so important…if the costs of care are higher than expected the members will have to contribute more capital. That is also why the payment model is so important. A current income statement and balance sheet would do little to inform your thinking. If you feel that you need more detail, then as part of your research you can explore income statements and balance sheets for comparable organizations and make reasonable assumptions based on that research.
I would like to know if we will be provided with a patient/provider mix of STHN in order to make an analysis on that.
Answer:
STHN is a start-up organization, so it would have limited experience with payor mix. The area is both poor and aged, so you can reasonably assume that the member organizations serve a heavier than average Medicare and Medicaid mix. If you feel this information is important to arrive at your recommendation, then as part of your research, examine the patient/provider mix in the member organizations listed for that region.
Question:
Will you provide us with an income statement and balance sheet?
Answer:
Review the resources provided with the case. Keep in mind that STHN is in start-up mode. It has had capital contributions from the members to get started. The members will need to make additional capital contributions based on the business plan. That is why re-looking at the assumptions and strategy is so important…if the costs of care are higher than expected the members will have to contribute more capital. That is also why the payment model is so important. A current income statement and balance sheet would do little to inform your thinking. If you feel that you need more detail, then as part of your research you can explore income statements and balance sheets for comparable organizations and make reasonable assumptions based on that research.
Wednesday, February 11, 2015
Case Questions and Answers
Greetings CLARION competition teams! Please send questions about the
case to clarion@umn.edu we will then post those questions along with our
responses on this blog. Please note: The deadline for submitting
questions is Friday February 27th
Friday, February 6, 2015
Some teams have submitted a request to see recent examples of past National Competition winners. The winning team from the CLARION 2014 National case competition was the University of Washington--Seattle. Follow the link below to see their presentation:
http://mediamill.cla.umn.edu/mediamill/display/221359
http://mediamill.cla.umn.edu/mediamill/display/221359
Monday, February 2, 2015
Hotel Information for CLARION National Case Competition 2015
Participants are encouraged to stay at the Commons Hotel, where a
block of rooms will be held. When you call for reservations, state that
you are a CLARION participant so you receive the discounted group rate.
2015 Rates:
Commons Hotel
2015 Rates:
Commons Hotel
$139.00
per night for two adults, with the cost increasing $20 for each
additional adult (rooms can accommodate four adults). Please make your
room reservations with the Commons by March 15, 2015, to receive the
discounted group rate.
Commons Hotel contact information:
Toll free: 1-800-822-6757
Direct: (612) 379-8888
Website:www.commonshotel.com
Address: 615 Washington Avenue SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414
Direct: (612) 379-8888
Website:www.commonshotel.com
Address: 615 Washington Avenue SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414
Saturday, January 24, 2015
Wednesday, January 21, 2015
2015 CLARION Local Case Competition Retreat Schedule
Saturday, January 24, 2015
1-450 Moos Tower
9:00 am Registration and Welcome (breakfast provided)
9:05 am Team Building Activities
10:00 am Root Cause Analysis Presentation, Dr.Sandra Potthoff
11:00 am Panel of Past Participants
11:30 am Case Competition Rules and Case Presentation
12:00 pm Adjourn
We encourage all teams to connect before leaving to exchange contact information and determine your next meeting time.
Thank you and good luck!
Saturday, January 24, 2015
1-450 Moos Tower
9:00 am Registration and Welcome (breakfast provided)
9:05 am Team Building Activities
10:00 am Root Cause Analysis Presentation, Dr.Sandra Potthoff
11:00 am Panel of Past Participants
11:30 am Case Competition Rules and Case Presentation
12:00 pm Adjourn
We encourage all teams to connect before leaving to exchange contact information and determine your next meeting time.
Thank you and good luck!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)