Thursday, April 2, 2015

Announcing the CLARION 2015 National Case Competition Judges, Judging Process, and Presentation Schedules

Greetings from Minnesota! We're happy to announce the individuals who will be Judging the CLARION 2015 National Case Competition:

Judges Bio's


Michael Cull, Ph.D., M.S.N. is a licensed nurse practitioner with a specialty in child and adolescent psychiatry. He holds a Master of Science in Nursing from Vanderbilt University and received his PhD from the Institute of Government at Tennessee State University. Dr. Cull is currently the Deputy Commissioner for Child Safety for the State of Tennessee.  Prior to his position as Deputy Commissioner, Dr. Cull was Assistant Professor in Health System Management at Vanderbilt and the Director of Education and Dissemination in the Office of Quality and Patient Safety for Vanderbilt University Medical Center. His prior experiences at Vanderbilt include serving as Executive Director of the Community Mental Health Center, Administrative Director of the Department of Psychiatry Patient Care Center, and Director of the Center of Excellence for Children in State Custody. Dr. Cull has extensive experience with organizational evaluation and improvement in healthcare and the human services.

Julianne (Julie) Morath, RN, MS, is a recognized expert in health care quality and patient safety. She serves as President and CEO of the Hospital Quality Institute (HQI), a collaboration of the California Hospital Association and the three Regional Associations. Prior to joining HQI, Morath served as Chief Quality and Patient Safety Officer for Vanderbilt University Medical Center. She is a founding and current member of the Lucian Leape Institute of the National Patient Safety Foundation and serves on the Board of Commissioners of The Joint Commission and the Board of the Virginia Mason Medical Center and Health System. Morath is a distinguished advisor to the National Patient Safety Foundation, past member of the National Quality Forum Best Practices Committee, and member of the Advisory Board to the Association of the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI). Recently, she was named by Becker Hospital Review as one of the top 50 experts leading patient safety.
Morath has more than three decades of executive and academic experience in health care that includes the University of Cincinnati, Brown University, University of Rhode Island, University of Minnesota, and Vanderbilt University. Her work is distinguished through translating research into practice and building cultures of safety and excellence. Before joining Vanderbilt, Morath served as COO of Children’s Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota. She is on the editorial boards of American Nurse and the Journal of Quality and Patient Safety.
Daniel Nelson, MD has more than thirty years of experience practicing as an ophthalmologist. He also serves on the board of directors for Westfields Hospital in New Richmond, Wisconsin, and on the board for the HealthPartners Research Foundation, where he is the chair of the finance and audit committee. Within the HealthPartners Medical Group, he is a member of the Eye Care Group and co-directs the HealthPartners Medical Group Improvement Institute. Dr. Nelson also remains active in clinical and basic science research projects. He received his medical degree and ophthalmology residency and specialty training in cornea and external disease at the University of Minnesota Medical School.

Richard (Rick) Norling, MHA, has provided transformational leadership for improving America’s healthcare for over three decades. In so doing, he has championed organizational excellence – delivery of value to stakeholders, ethics and transparency in operation. Norling was CEO of Premiere Inc., president and CEO of Fairview Health System and executive vice president and COO of UniHealth America.  He has served on the boards of several national, state, and local organizations. Including Premiere, the cross-industry national Healthcare Leadership Council, Malcolm Baldridge Foundation, Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Pacificare Health System, and Blue Cross of California. For many years he has been a leader in the Organizational Development Partnership Network, based in Great Britain, which collaboratively studies the healthcare systems of developed countries around the globe.

As a Senior Fellow of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Rick speaks with experience afforded by that frontline work, enduring passion for improvement rooted in an educational ground of systems improvement and healthcare management, and broad perspective on America’s overall health system—how it compares to its potential and in the world, and what it needs to advance. 
 
John Overton, M.D., has a longstanding interest in safety and process improvement in health care and aviation. He is a member of the American Medical Association, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and the Air Medical Physicians Association and he serves as a Board Member for the Commission on Accreditation of Medical Transport Systems.  

Dr. Overton’s current pursuits consist of consulting in health care safety and participation in a multidisciplinary alliance of professionals whose focus is just culture, risk and safety management, operational audits, and organizational leadership. As a professional invested in maximizing safety and system efficiency, he acknowledges that there is much to learn and share across disciplines.  

Mark Sims, MBA, is the CEO of Grand Strand Regional Hospital in Myrtle Beach South Carolina. Sims previously served as chief executive officer of TriStar StoneCrest Medical Center, a 109-bed acute care facility in Smyrna, TN.  Prior to TriStar StoneCrest, he served as chief executive officer at Parkridge East Medical Center, Chattanooga, TN, and chief executive officer at Grandview Medical Center, Jasper, TN.

A fellow of the American College of Healthcare Executives, Sims earned a bachelor of science degree in human environment sciences from the University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, and a master of business administration degree in healthcare from Belmont University, Nashville, TN. Sims has served on the advisory boards of The Hope Clinic (TN), the American Heart Association and the Rutherford (TN) Chamber of Commerce.

Judging process and schedule

With 15 teams and 6 Judges we have designed a new system for our competition process so that we can continue to accommodate all teams presenting on the same day. All Judges are trained together for consistency and standardization using the judging rubric and scoring. Judges will rotate between the two presentation rooms throughout the day. Teams will not be required to present a 2nd time. Instead, judges will rely on the standardized scoring process and will have the ability to review recorded presentations during final deliberations as needed. Teams have been assigned numbers, presentation times, and presentation rooms.  Each team will have 20 minutes to present followed by a 10 minute question and answer period. Teams will then have an additional 10 minute feedback session with judges immediately following the Question and Answer period. 1st, 2nd, and 3rd place winners will be announced at the awards banquet on the evening of Saturday April 18th. Please note: While final numerical scores are never shared with any teams, all participants will receive a link to their own presentation along with links to the winning presentations. Judges will be present at the Awards banquet and welcome opportunities for conversation. The full presentation schedule is listed below:

 



Monday, March 9, 2015

Question about submitting National Team Roster information:
 
You can find the team roster form on page 33 of your Guidebook. You can e-mail that form as soon as its complete to:
clarion@umn.edu or fax to (612)626-5554

While the Deadline for submission is listed as April 14th, please submit the form as soon as you know those details. Please also notify us if you are bringing advisors or other visitors. 

Monday, February 16, 2015

CLARION Case Question and Answer 2/16/15

Question: Are we to assume that the member organizations of STHN all participate in the same national database for patient satisfaction?

Answer: Yes, you can make that assumption.

Friday, February 13, 2015

Updated Judging Rubric

Greetings teams! There has been a slight change to the Judging Rubric that we would like to bring to your attention. Teams will be judged using the following score sheet (which is slightly different from the one listed in your current guidebooks)



Criteria
Score

Low



High
Presentation Content (55%)





Identified and focused on major issues of the case.
1
2
3
4
5
Performed quality analysis that supports the recommendations.
1
2
3
4
5
Incorporated interprofessional practice into the analysis and recommendations.
1
2
3
4
5
Demonstrated clear evidence that a variety of health profession perspectives are included.    
1
2
3
4
5
Extent to which recommendations resolve the major issues in the case.
1
2
3
4
5
Feasibility of the recommendations.
1
2
3
4
5
Creativity of the recommendations.
1
2
3
4
5
Implementation plan prioritized the issues and recommendations.
1
2
3
4
5
Quality of the cost analysis.
1
2
3
4
5






Presentation Style (25%)





Poise and professionalism of verbal delivery.
1
2
3
4
5
Each team member had a meaningful role.
1
2
3
4
5
Quality of presentation materials.
1
2
3
4
5
Coordination of written materials with verbal presentation.
1
2
3
4
5






Questions and Answers (20%)





Answered questions that were posed.
1
2
3
4
5
Responses demonstrated breadth and depth in understanding the issues.
1
2
3
4
5
Responses were clear and well-articulated.
1
2
3
4
5
All team members participated in answering questions.
1
2
3
4
5