Updated Judging Rubric

Greetings teams! There has been a slight change to the Judging Rubric that we would like to bring to your attention. Teams will be judged using the following score sheet (which is slightly different from the one listed in your current guidebooks)

Criteria	Score
	Low				High
Presentation Content (55%)
Identified and focused on major issues of the case.	1	2	3	4	5
Performed quality analysis that supports the recommendations.	1	2	3	4	5
Incorporated interprofessional practice into the analysis and recommendations.	1	2	3	4	5
Demonstrated clear evidence that a variety of health profession perspectives are included.	1	2	3	4	5
Extent to which recommendations resolve the major issues in the case.	1	2	3	4	5
Feasibility of the recommendations.	1	2	3	4	5
Creativity of the recommendations.	1	2	3	4	5
Implementation plan prioritized the issues and recommendations.	1	2	3	4	5
Quality of the cost analysis.	1	2	3	4	5
Presentation Style (25%)
Poise and professionalism of verbal delivery.	1	2	3	4	5
Each team member had a meaningful role.	1	2	3	4	5
Quality of presentation materials.	1	2	3	4	5
Coordination of written materials with verbal presentation.	1	2	3	4	5
Questions and Answers (20%)
Answered questions that were posed.	1	2	3	4	5
Responses demonstrated breadth and depth in understanding the issues.	1	2	3	4	5
Responses were clear and well-articulated.	1	2	3	4	5
All team members participated in answering questions.	1	2	3	4	5